In every country, people get into arguments, hold racist views or suffer from mental health issues. But in the U.S., it is easier for those people to pick up a gun and shoot someone.
That reality is what allowed an 18-year-old to obtain an assault rifle and kill 19 children and two teachers at an elementary school classroom in Uvalde, Texas, on Tuesday. And it is what makes the U.S. a global outlier when it comes to gun violence, with more gun deaths than any of its peers.
This chart, looking at public shootings in which four or more people were killed, shows how much the U.S. stands out:
In today’s newsletter, I want to walk through three ways to think about America’s gun problem.
The number of guns
Where there are more guns, there are more gun deaths. Studies have found this to be true at the state and national level. It is true for homicides, suicides, mass shootings and even police shootings.
It is an intuitive idea: If guns are more available, people will use them more often. If you replaced “guns” in that sentence with another noun, it would be so obvious as to be banal.
But federal laws are lax. Other developed countries typically require at least a license to own a gun, if they allow someone to get a firearm at all. In the U.S., even a background check is not always required to buy a gun — a result of poor enforcement and legal loopholes.
Reducing mass shootings
The U.S. is always going to have more guns, and consequently more deaths, than other rich countries. Given the Second Amendment, mixed public opinion and a closely divided federal government, lawmakers face sharp limits on how far they can go.
But since America’s gun laws are so weak, there is a lot of room to improve — and at least cut some gun deaths.
To reduce mass shootings, experts have several ideas:
More thorough background checks might stop some gunmen, like those in the church shootings in Charleston, S.C., in 2015 and in Sutherland Springs, Texas, in 2017.
“Red flag” laws allow law enforcement officials to confiscate guns from people who display warning signs of violence, like threatening their peers or family members. The laws might have applied to the gunman in the Parkland, Fla., school shooting in 2018.
Assault weapon bans would restrict or prohibit access to the kinds of rifles shooters often use. A ban could at least make mass shootings less deadly by pushing gunmen toward less effective weapons, some experts argue.
But it is hard to say exactly how much impact these measures would have, because little good research exists on the effects of gun policies on mass shootings. One unanswered question is whether a determined gunman would find a way to bypass the laws: If he can’t use an assault rifle, would he resort to a handgun or shotgun? That could make the shooting less deadly, but not stop it altogether.
The bigger problem
Most shootings in America never appear in national headlines. The majority of gun deaths in 2021 were suicides. Nearly half were homicides that occurred outside mass shootings; they are more typical acts of violence on streets and in homes (and most involve handguns). Mass shootings were responsible for less than 2 percent of last year’s gun deaths.
Stricter gun laws could also reduce the more common gun deaths. It all comes down to the same problem: More guns equal more gun deaths, whether a gang shootout in California, a suicide in Wyoming or a school shooting in Texas.
The latest on the shooting
Opinions and analysis
The U.S. has lost the will to protect its citizens — women, racial minorities and especially children, Roxane Gay argues.
Australia, Britain and other countries tightened their gun laws after mass shootings. Amanda Taub explains why the U.S. is different. In those countries, restrictions led to less gun violence, Max Fisher writes.
Changing America’s gun culture — not its gun laws — is the bigger challenge, Graeme Wood argues in The Atlantic.
The Uvalde shooting defies easy policy solutions, Reason’s Elizabeth Nolan Brown writes.
We need to confront mental instability, social isolation and other cultural problems driving young men to violence, Kaylee McGhee White argues in The Washington Examiner.
THE LATEST NEWS
Other Big Stories
Georgia’s primary results suggest that many Republican voters are ready to move on from Trump’s election lies, Gail Collins says.
Turkey is crushing the Kurds. NATO doesn’t seem to care, Cihan Tugal writes.
Abortion benefits men, too, Andréa Becker argues.
“Grandfluencers”: On TikTok, the over-65 set is thriving.
A Times classic: Marie Kondo and TV’s spiritual consumerism.
Advice from Wirecutter: How to organize your cookbooks.
Lives Lived: Julie Beckett’s daughter, Katie, contracted viral encephalitis in 1978, leaving her dependent on a ventilator. The two became advocates for changes to Medicaid that let families care for disabled children at home. Julie Beckett died at 72.
ARTS AND IDEAS
The end of ‘Ellen’
After 19 years, Ellen DeGeneres’s daytime talk show airs its final episode today.
At its peak, “Ellen” was a ratings success, known for its playful tone, A-list celebrity interviews and cash giveaways. DeGeneres, a groundbreaking comedian, appeared in millions of living rooms daily as an openly gay person, beating the odds after coming out nearly ended her career in the ’90s.
But her legacy became more troubled in recent years. BuzzFeed News revealed that members of the show’s staff had confronted racism, fear and intimidation on set, as well as sexual harassment from producers. Warner Bros. fired three executives, and DeGeneres, whose motto was “be kind,” issued an on-air apology in 2020.
Even before the hit to her reputation — and the show’s declining ratings — DeGeneres had suggested in 2018 that she was weary of daytime TV and was preparing to leave.
“In the heyday of ‘Ellen,’ that show was a career-defining booking,” a Hollywood publicist told BuzzFeed News. Now, the publicist’s up-and-coming celebrity clients prefer spots on “The Kelly Clarkson Show” and “The Drew Barrymore Show.”
For more: Read BuzzFeed News’s Krystie Lee Yandoli on the show’s complicated legacy.
PLAY, WATCH, EAT
What to Cook
The pangram from yesterday’s Spelling Bee was taxonomy. Here is today’s puzzle — or you can play online.
Source : Nytimes