Four witnesses testified Wednesday, including two who were recalled to the stand, before US District Judge Norman K. Moon began explaining the complex instructions to the jury.
Fourteen people and 10 White supremacist and nationalist organizations are named in the lawsuit that prompted the trial. Organizers of the rally are accused of engaging in a conspiracy to commit violence. The plaintiffs, who include town residents and counterprotesters injured in clashes, are seeking “compensatory and statutory” damages for physical and emotional injuries they suffered.
The jury will decide in each instance whether a defendant is liable for damages. In a civil trial, plaintiffs’ attorneys only have to show a defendant is liable due to a “preponderance of evidence,” which means a 51% or greater chance, Moon told jurors.
The almost three-week trial featured attorneys for victims of the violence putting together puzzle pieces for jurors and arguing that the defendants acted as an interconnected web, meant to goad counterprotesters into violent battles.
“Our plaintiffs have provided overwhelming evidence that Unite the Right was never intended to be peaceful protest — rather, it was a meticulously planned weekend of racist, antisemitic violence,” Integrity First for America executive director Amy Spitalnick said in a statement. “We’re incredibly proud to support these courageous plaintiffs as they seek much-needed accountability and justice.”
The defense notably displayed less cohesion than the plaintiffs’ side, oftentimes shifting the blame for the violence, arguing they didn’t like each other, taking snipes at one another and alleging they barely knew each other.
They have said they did not initiate the deadly violence that ensued and argued they were exercising their First Amendment right to protest. They also say there was no conspiracy and the violence stemmed from law enforcement’s failure to keep the opposing groups separated.
Spencer testified that he not only wasn’t involved in any of the planning for the deadly rally, but that he also was concerned about potential violence and wanted to make sure he kept the peace.
“If I was there it would definitely attract Antifa. This would make the rally something different and that concerned me,” Spencer said, adding that he was more interested in the fame and notoriety of being the most recognizable leader of the alt-right, not the organizer of a violent confrontation allegedly aimed at being the start of a race war.
Cantwell gave jurors examples of where he warned others not to engage in violence.
He told listeners of his program, the “Radical Agenda,” that they were not to bring the level of violence he talks about on his show to Charlottesville. He said his show is for entertainment purposes and told listeners to leave their guns at home.
Closing arguments are scheduled for Thursday and the jury is expected to begin deliberations Friday.
Some of the defendants — including Cantwell — have faced criminal charges related to their activities. In 2018, he pleaded guilty to assault and battery in connection to his use of pepper spray during the rally.
Fields is serving two concurrent life sentences.
Mark Morales reported from Charlottesville. Steve Almasy reported and wrote from Atlanta. CNN’s Amir Vera and Mallory Simon contributed to this report.
Source : CNN